4 ms·

A truly philosophically pure laptop would, among other things, guarantee absolutely no involvement of slave labor/abusive practices in its supply chain. Everyon

A truly philosophically pure laptop would, among other things, guarantee absolutely no involvement of slave labor/abusive practices in its supply chain. Everyone from the mines to the assembly plant to the retail store would have secure, middle-class employment. Revenue would not fund political corruption or violence related to labor, natural resources, or environmental impact. But it would not contain binary blobs either, so this is a positive step. The branding is a little grandiose for the extent of its "philosophical purity," though.

orblivion 12y ago
Depends what philosophy you're talking about.
- deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]
wyager 12y ago
That may be your philosophy. I care more about open computer systems than making everyone middle class (which doesn't even make sense; by the well-ordering principle, there will always be a lower class). I think that open computers are more important for the long-term improvement of the human race than the pursuit of presently unrealizable economic goals.
- xamolxix 12y ago
  > I care more about open computer systems than making everyone middle class The parent speaks about slave labour or something very close to it not about living in the suburbs. > there will always be a lower class That is your opinion and it may be true. Even so, the "lower class" could live without the worry of basic necessities. A lot of people do not currently have that luxury.
  - yoklov 12y ago
    > That is your opinion Well, it's not really an opinion though. Unless everybody had a perfectly equal standard of living (which sounds vaguely Harrison Bergeron-esque) there will always be a lower class, even if they have a rather high standard of living. Other than that, I agree with everything you say in your comment.
    - walterbell 12y ago
      Ranking depends on the variable of comparison. There can be more than one.
ada1981 12y ago
I was certain this post was going to be about a "pure" supply chain. Conflict Free Laptops would be an amazing offering.
vezzy-fnord 12y ago
There actually is at least one software license (the HESSLA) which has restrictions on use and redistribution regarding human rights: http://www.hacktivismo.com/about/hessla.php http://www.hacktivismo.com/about/hessla.php It is considered non-free by the standards of the FSF, Debian and the OSI alike. As such, ironically enough it's your proposal that ends up being "philosophically impure".

orblivion 12y ago

Depends what philosophy you're talking about.

deleted 12y ago
[deleted]

wyager 12y ago

That may be your philosophy. I care more about open computer systems than making everyone middle class (which doesn't even make sense; by the well-ordering principle, there will always be a lower class). I think that open computers are more important for the long-term improvement of the human race than the pursuit of presently unrealizable economic goals.

xamolxix 12y ago
> I care more about open computer systems than making everyone middle class The parent speaks about slave labour or something very close to it not about living in the suburbs. > there will always be a lower class That is your opinion and it may be true. Even so, the "lower class" could live without the worry of basic necessities. A lot of people do not currently have that luxury.
- yoklov 12y ago
  > That is your opinion Well, it's not really an opinion though. Unless everybody had a perfectly equal standard of living (which sounds vaguely Harrison Bergeron-esque) there will always be a lower class, even if they have a rather high standard of living. Other than that, I agree with everything you say in your comment.
  - walterbell 12y ago
    Ranking depends on the variable of comparison. There can be more than one.

ada1981 12y ago

I was certain this post was going to be about a "pure" supply chain. Conflict Free Laptops would be an amazing offering.

vezzy-fnord 12y ago

There actually is at least one software license (the HESSLA) which has restrictions on use and redistribution regarding human rights: http://www.hacktivismo.com/about/hessla.php http://www.hacktivismo.com/about/hessla.php It is considered non-free by the standards of the FSF, Debian and the OSI alike. As such, ironically enough it's your proposal that ends up being "philosophically impure".