5 ms·
I wrote the headline; I'm British. It's always a little awkward to pick a term here, as we don't usually like to refer to ourselves at all much. "Brits" was too
by dannyobrien 12y ago
I wrote the headline; I'm British. It's always a little awkward to pick a term here, as we don't usually like to refer to ourselves at all much. "Brits" was too informal for this. UK citizens would have sounded a bit too Airstrip One. Britons has a nice newspaperly ring, but I agree with you that it is potentially a little corny, so I believe we only use it for this particular page.
I also have to deal with the trickiness that the text has to simultaneously address UK people wanting to take action, and explain the action to curious people outside of the UK.
For instance, the main action uses different language:
https://act.eff.org/action/tell-britain-s-lords-don-t-let-the-snooper-s-charter-sneak-past-you https://act.eff.org/action/tell-britain-s-lords-don-t-let-th...
- yellowapple 12y ago> UK citizens would have sounded a bit too Airstrip One Which probably would have been fitting in this context.
- jasonm23 12y ago> Loyal Citizens of Eurasia and Subjects of Big Brother, Act now! Something like that?
- ch215 12y agoI'm nitpicking, I know, but "act" ought to be amended "bill" in the third paragraph. Apologies for being such a pedant.
- dannyobrien 12y agoFixed. Thanks!