I generally disconsider OO as a basic programming paradigm, not only because it is mostly badly designed in most programming languages, but mainly because moder

I generally disconsider OO as a basic programming paradigm, not only because it is mostly badly designed in most programming languages, but mainly because modern languages already provide what OO was there to solve in the first place - in a much better way. However, this article is mostly flawed - it's just a lot of ranting entangled with some random facts, curiosities and things that have nothing to do with any valid reasoning. Also, most reasoning behind the article falls into some argumentative fallacy, like ad populum. In summary, it just fails miserably.