2 ms·

the point here is that the iPhone is a lot less 'fragmentable' than Android since it's controlled by one single manufacturer. Sure, it will eventually change fe

by herval 17y ago

the point here is that the iPhone is a lot less 'fragmentable' than Android since it's controlled by one single manufacturer. Sure, it will eventually change features so much that apps made for the latest hardware will no longer work on previous ones - but it will probably be a lot easier to manage than having a thousand different versions of the hardware, all being released at once... Plus, AAPL's "throw away and buy the shiny new one" ethos has kept the majority of users constantly updating their already new ipod/iphone/mac for quite some time, so this fragmentation might as well be yet another strong point on their evil marketing plot. "1st gen iphone? Sheesh, that's too old, go get a new one"

unalone 17y ago
Is that really the ethos you see Apple emanating? Because I've always seen the opposite. One of the things that I thought coolest about Apple back when I was on Windows were the people who talked about installing Leopard on a Powerbook and having it still work perfectly. Ditto the iPhone now. In fact, the line I hear directly from Apple is "Because we have no physical controls, we're allowed to keep our 1st gen iPhones in line with our freshest models, so the iPhone will outlast many of the other phones its age." Certainly my iPod is showing no strain in its second year. I haven't even upgraded to 3.0 and it still feels great.