3 ms·
I wouldn't say my bias is so strong, more that you're allowing labor statistics to water down what would be meaningful paths to being a billionaire via the fina
by brd 12y ago
I wouldn't say my bias is so strong, more that you're allowing labor statistics to water down what would be meaningful paths to being a billionaire via the finance industry.
To your point: A large majority of the tech billionaires have software backgrounds yet only ~30% of the IT industry are programmers. So while the IT industry may look like a better place than finance, its really programming that looks better, not IT.
- dalke 12y agoI was suggesting that "just hard work and competence" was insufficient to explain the reason for success. FWIW, assuming that "newly minted" means "within the last year", only 3 of the 27 listed at http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2014/billionaires/newcomers.html http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2014/billionaires/newco... come from the investment industry. 5 come from the entertainment industry.
- brd 12y agoI must have misread a headline at some point because the number of finance billionaires is smaller than I thought. Having said that, of the 268 listed by forbes, 15 were in finance. http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexmorrell/2014/03/06/worlds-billionaires-newcomers-the-full-list-of-268/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexmorrell/2014/03/06/worlds-bi... Anyway, I'd certainly agree that "hard work and competence" is an understatement but one of the luxuries of being in finance is that your entire career is built around making money from money. This affords a much more systematic approach to being a billionaire than you might find in other industries.