4 ms·

For smaller projects that's fine, but if you have a lot of outstanding pull requests under discussion that's a lot of continual rebasing as they each get merged

by Nemo157 12y ago

For smaller projects that's fine, but if you have a lot of outstanding pull requests under discussion that's a lot of continual rebasing as they each get merged. (What if the two fee fixes in the article were done at the same time and reviewed by different project maintainers?)

jfaucett 12y ago
That sounds really unorganized to me at least, I mean the linux kernel is large and there's only one guy at the end of the day merging all that stuff. I would think that in larger projects a better practice would be a distributed hierarchy of merges until a PR finally got submitted to master, not a massive blob of just send everything to master as a PR and let various maintainers merge whatever at will.