4 ms·
Agreed. For non metric people, your proposition is calling for something to be able to transport a package around 2lbs approximately 9,000 miles. Flying below
by at-fates-hands 12y ago
Agreed.
For non metric people, your proposition is calling for something to be able to transport a package around 2lbs approximately 9,000 miles.
Flying below radar has its own challenges, as described here: http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/2952/can-you-actually-fly-under-the-radar http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/2952/can-you-act...
Your real issue would be finding an efficient enough engine to fly that far with a few refueling points along the way, thus making the trip longer than what you're probably envisioning. This is why I'm assuming jeffasinger has proposed a blimp or some form of a blimp to get this accomplished.
Yes, it can be done, but with several caveats.
- toomuchtodo 12y agoIf you don't care about your cross section, solar would fit the bill: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Pathfinder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Pathfinder
- FeeTinesAMady 12y agoThat is an impressive aircraft, but far too large and expensive for these purposes.