> It is far more useful than wealth, and invulnerable to inheritance tax. It is brains. Not to sound unfair, but isn't this how mate selection works? Why would

> It is far more useful than wealth, and invulnerable to inheritance tax. It is brains. Not to sound unfair, but isn't this how mate selection works? Why would two successful, bright people not want to mate and create successful, bright children? Isn't this what we want for our children, to be bright, capable, with functional, stable households and marriages brought about by parents who they themselves value education and a stable marriage/family? I'm all for equality and the anti-aristocracy sentiment (I was a first generation college student, and my parents come from humble backgrounds), but it seems like the whole bend on the genetic predisposition of privileged children based on what they are born with seems like exactly what the whole point of evolution of the human species is about - creating a better version of ourselves.