3 ms·
>Blackberry is asking for recognition that they can not compete in their own industry. If Blackberry merely wanted "recognition that they can not compete," the
by declan 12y ago
>Blackberry is asking for recognition that they can not compete in their own industry.
If Blackberry merely wanted "recognition that they can not compete," they could put out a press release.
Anytime you write a letter to Congress that includes the phrase "must be mandated" -- as Blackberry's CEO did -- it's abundantly clear you're asking a new law.
- xnull4guest 12y agoDid I say merely? Blackberry is asking for recognition that they can not compete in their own industry. Not because they aren't able to build phones or write phone software or any other sensible reason. There is a barrier to the phone market for all but a few blessed companies. They are asking that legal action be brought to bear on the situation. Any time one looks at the interaction markets and laws they will find that both regulation and the lack of regulation can unfairly benefit the few over the many. One cannot snub regulation OR deregulation of markets merely on ideology. There is an implicit snub here: "Blackberry looking for regulation as a handout. How corrupt - they must not be able to compete because they suck and are looking for some other avenue." I argue that the reason Blackberry can't compete isn't due to their 'sucking' (they may or may not 'suck'), but due to other fundamentally asymmetric market forces that favor few enshrined parties at the cost of the many who would want to compete. I say this not as a supporter of BlackBerry (I've never owned a BB device, never planned to, and dislike them for backdooring their devices for governments). Instead I say this as a consumer who wants real choices and real market competition, and as a techie who would like to see software compatibility at large.