No, the commenter is saying that at some point in the past the government put lipstick on a pig, so now he will assume that anything he sees wearing lipstick is

No, the commenter is saying that at some point in the past the government put lipstick on a pig, so now he will assume that anything he sees wearing lipstick is probably a pig (unless of course it is something of direct benefit to him in which case his selfish rationalization does not need to mask itself behind moronic rhetoric.)