4 ms·
Your example of a law that would force Apple to allow Blackberry to write its own iMessage client would open two major problems: - companies like Twitter w
by dshankar 12y ago
Your example of a law that would force Apple to allow Blackberry to write its own iMessage client would open two major problems:
- companies like Twitter would be forced to allow 3rd-parties to write clients, and could kill Twitter's sources of revenue
- Blackberry could write an insecure client & harm Apple customers
In general, open APIs and third-party development is a great thing. But to require it? That's extreme.
Besides, isn't proprietary technology an excellent way to differentiate product offerings? Why must it be accessible on competing platforms and thus invalidate my differentiating value?
- andrewfong 12y agoWhich is why I added "not saying I agree with them". But requiring an open API (or at least not placing restrictions on an existing API) isn't conceptually all that different from requiring Microsoft to allow browsers other than IE on Windows, and apparently a lot of people think that's a good idea.