3 ms·

taking that guy seriously is a really great example of how desperate things have gotten out there.

• MrDom 12y ago
  He provides links to facts and actual emails. What do you provide, besides indignation?
• mafribe 12y ago
  Devin, can you provide concrete, actionable evidence, admissible in a court of justice that "that guy" is wrong with the core points of his article?
  • ijk 12y ago
    Hey, let's apply the same standard of evidence you've been demanding from others to your post! Can you provide evidence that's admissible in a court of justice that support the core points of the article?
    • mafribe 12y ago
      Applying the same standard of evidence to my others does in no way, shape or form solve your problem of providing evidence that's admissible in a court of justice that support the core points of the article? Since the Sarkeesians, Van Valkenburgs and Flynts of this world started out with claiming GG harrassment (and are profiting handsomely from it), it behooves them and their supporters to come up with evidence first.
    • MrDom 12y ago
      The evidence is in the article. He displays emails in their entirety that talk about members of the press colluding on coverage. That's admissible in a court of law. Here are more emails[0]. It's put up or shut up time. Either you're going to provide a thorough counter of the evidence provided or everybody will know exactly what you are: a liar. [0]: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/09/18/the-emails-that-prove-video-games-journalism-must-be-reformed/ http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/09/18/the-emails-that-p...