3 ms·
There are certainly no problems with supervised recounts. Look how well they go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_gubernatorial_election,_2004 http://en
by angryprofessor 19y ago
There are certainly no problems with supervised recounts. Look how well they go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_gubernatorial_election,_2004 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_gubernatorial_electi...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_elec...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_2000 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_200...
I'm not saying electronic is definately the way to go. I'm just saying that paper ballots also have big problems, and that one can protect reasonably well against pure software hacks.
- brlewis 19y agoYou've pointed out exactly why supervised recounts with paper ballots are so much better. You can look how well they go.