2 ms·

I think all OP is trying to point out is that it either agrees with bayesian methods or it's wrong... so at best it's not materially new, and at worst it's usin

by dlss 12y ago

I think all OP is trying to point out is that it either agrees with bayesian methods or it's wrong... so at best it's not materially new, and at worst it's using questionable assumptions.

GFK_of_xmaspast 12y ago
"it either agrees with bayesian methods or it's wrong" This kind of faith-based statistics is pure ideology.