4 ms·
Less likely to hire. And the popularity of MBAs is because (a) that's where the pool of leaders tends to go for education (I said tends, people), but (b) it's
by madair 17y ago
Less likely to hire.
And the popularity of MBAs is because (a) that's where the pool of leaders tends to go for education (I said tends, people), but (b) it's also a self-reinforcing psuedo-class system. Look for correlations in the military and older class structures such as aristocracy & feudalism.
- madair 17y agoBTW, I've made this decision several times before, I'm not just guessing what I'd do.
- natrius 17y agoCare to explain that logic? It seems a bit unreasonable to me.
- madair 17y agoFor the less likely to hire, because I desire being a part of breaking down class barriers. For my belief that it's a pseudo-class structure, it's just based on the invisible lines drawn between management and workers in the corporations that I've worked.
- nitrogen 17y agoIn my previous jobs, there were visible lines drawn between management and workers, with different colors representing each. On a serious note, my first job I ever had was at a startup, as the ~25th employee. There was a culture of promotion, and people who started at the bottom eventually worked their way to the top. The most recent job I left before starting my own company, however, was a relatively large corporation (though I was in a very small division). There was relatively little promotion through the ranks, and a lot more direct hiring into management positions. Has anyone else observed such an inverse correlation between company size and the likelihood of promotion?