4 ms·
Agatha Christie is indeed enjoyable, but she hasn't been read for hundreds of years. Do you really think people will be reading her 200 years from now? I'm not
by thret 12y ago
Agatha Christie is indeed enjoyable, but she hasn't been read for hundreds of years. Do you really think people will be reading her 200 years from now?
I'm not sure why you think what is considered a classic could be dictated by what is taught in schools? I can see no basis for this assertion.
- learc83 12y ago> Do you really think people will be reading her 200 years from now? Well people have been reading her novels for 95 years now, and she's sold over 2 billion copies. So the answer is yes I do. >I'm not sure why you think what is considered a classic could be dictated by what is taught in schools? I can see no basis for this assertion. Because what most people consider classics are books they were told are classics--mostly by their high school literature teacher. I'm sure there are more objective measures, but the majority of people certainly don't use them. Being a classic is a bit self propagating. Kids grow up hearing that Ethan Frome is a classic, they become teachers and teach their students that Ethan Frome is a classic.
- firebones 12y agoThe Lindy Effect [1] would say that the best guess is that they'll still be reading her 95 years from now... [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_Effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_Effect