2 ms·
I'm not sure what "full fat" means, but compared with current gfortran in my experience, ifort is incorrect by default, surprisingly unreliable, and typically g
by gnufx 12y ago
I'm not sure what "full fat" means, but compared with current gfortran in my experience, ifort is incorrect by default, surprisingly unreliable, and typically generates similar speed code at the 10% level. My all-free software build of a quantum chemistry program was reported to run faster than an all-Intel libraries one on a cluster which has faster processors but is otherwise very similar to ours.
If you just write in Fortran, you don't have to have to debug two versions.