3 ms·
I've seen these before but I've always stayed away because the costs for commercial licensing aren't spelled out or even estimated at all. I just never liked to
by colinbartlett 12y ago
I've seen these before but I've always stayed away because the costs for commercial licensing aren't spelled out or even estimated at all. I just never liked to anticipate the friction involved if I were to incorporate these into a project that would become a commercial endeavor.
- zdw 12y ago"noncommercial" is impossibly vague to enforce. If a not-for-profit entity like a library used one of these to make a T-shirt that is sold at a profit (but the profit goes to the non-profit) is that commercial use? What if the design is done by a for-profit design firm for the non-profit library? What if the non-profit library installs it on it's computers, and they get used by someone on a for-profit project? Anytime you put a "profit" based limit on a license, you're probably doing it wrong. I'd much rather have a GPL style copyleft than this - it's less invasive.
- carbocation 12y agoIt's not clear to me that "non-commercial" would permit any for-profit or not-for-profit use. Both are commercial.
- gerry_shaw 12y agoEasy to stay away from when the server has been done for the last couple of hours.
- Punkbustar1 12y agoI agree. Clearly the author is a communist.