3 ms·
Yeah I think you can argue those are the costs of bad policy or reaction, not the attack. How many people could have been saved from heart disease with the sam
by nodata 12y ago
Yeah I think you can argue those are the costs of bad policy or reaction, not the attack.
How many people could have been saved from heart disease with the same amount of money?
- CHY872 12y agoThat's not the NSA's problem, though. By all means criticise the US as a whole for that. I'm less in agreement with your second point - you can easily apply it to any slightly frivolous spending. If petrol usage efficiency in the US went up by 10% for example (should be easily achievable for not much cost), in principle the money saved overall would be over $10 billion in 2014. That'd save a lot of lives, too.