4 ms·
That was actually refuted by the guys Kripke cited: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/264345529_Reply_to_Evidence_for_harm_comment_on__by_Kripke__Langer
by jawngee 12y ago
That was actually refuted by the guys Kripke cited:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/264345529_Reply_to_Evidence_for_harm_comment_on__by_Kripke__Langer http://www.researchgate.net/publication/264345529_Reply_to_E...
- vellum 12y agoFull pdf here: http://www.antonpottegaard.dk/publications/letters/[l002%20-%20NOT%20FINAL]%20Letter%20-%20Reply%20to%20%27Evidence%20for%20harm,%20comment%20on...%27%20by%20Kripke%20&%20Langer.pdf http://www.antonpottegaard.dk/publications/letters/[l002%20-...
- foobarqux 12y agoThat's interesting, thanks. Were you already familiar with the original study?