4 ms·
That changes things, it's a shame the website doesn't explicitly say that it's faster than gzip to decompress, it just says it's faster than LZMA, which isn't s
by jleahy 12y ago
That changes things, it's a shame the website doesn't explicitly say that it's faster than gzip to decompress, it just says it's faster than LZMA, which isn't saying much.
Much better than lz4hc (7 ns/byte, but only compresses to 44MB):
lz4hc 0.9 44,182,558 392,102,544 43,617 x 392,146,161 65 7 14 LZ77 26