4 ms·
FWIW I also did a test of Node:master and that performance was within 2% of what I measured for io.js. Interesting background about typed-arrays. I didn't know
by mschoebel 12y ago
FWIW I also did a test of Node:master and that performance was within 2% of what I measured for io.js.
Interesting background about typed-arrays. I didn't know that. Thanks!
- mikkom 12y ago> FWIW I also did a test of Node:master and that performance was within 2% of what I measured for io.js. It would have been a good thing to include that comment to the article as well.
- mschoebel 12y agoI thought about that. But it would have diminished the point I was trying to make: Always test with different versions as performance may differ by a LOT.
- jacquesm 12y agoWell, if the point is that they are different then I see what you're saying but in actual fact the point seems to be they're almost equal.
- barrkel 12y agoHe was talking about differences between point versions. 0.10 has dramatically different performance to 0.11. io.js is using 0.11, as is node:master, but older node was using 0.10. I.e. the difference isn't necessarily node vs io, it's one point release of V8 to the next as used by node and io.
- jacquesm 12y agoSupremely bad title then.