3 ms·
One could simply choose an alternate symbol, e.g. record~>fieldname (which is similar to C++). I admit choosing a symbol in Haskell is a bit harder, since most
by yummyfajitas 12y ago
One could simply choose an alternate symbol, e.g. record~>fieldname (which is similar to C++). I admit choosing a symbol in Haskell is a bit harder, since most of the easy ones are already taken.
- chongli 12y agoYes and Haskell allows arbitrary user-defined operators. Once the genie is out of that bottle it's hard to put it back inside!