3 ms·
That page is a bit too much marketing fluff for my linking. A couple other interesting pages on the 4004: * An oral history from the developers [1]. One intere
by kens 12y ago
That page is a bit too much marketing fluff for my linking. A couple other interesting pages on the 4004:
* An oral history from the developers [1]. One interesting part is that Intel procrastinates for months on developing the chip. Faggin gets hired to work on the chip, and Shima flies in from Japan the very next day to check on progress. He's very upset to find out that nothing has happened and starts yelling at Faggin, who just got there. They eventually work together to get the chip finished.
* Federico Faggin's website [2] with his perspective on the chip.
[1] http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/Oral_History/Intel_4004_2/102658187.05.01.acc.pdf http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/Oral_Histo...
[2] http://www.intel4004.com/ http://www.intel4004.com/
And I should mention that Texas Instruments built and announced the TMX-1795 microprocessor chip before the 4004. This chip's architecture and instruction set was basically identical to the 8008 (since both were copies of the Datapoint 2200). Texas Instruments patented the TMX-1795 (which was a hugely valuable patent) and then abandoned the chip because it didn't work well.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- chiph 12y agoI'm almost through with reading Walter Isaacson's The Innovators and he covers the patent issue - Intel and TI both recognized that their respective innovations were essentially simultaneous, and decided to cross-license each other's patents. And then remarkably, opened up licensing to other firms for a nominal fee. Without this, the industry could not have grown as fast as it did.