> In 1962, physicist and historian Thomas Kuhn proposed that science makes progress not just through the gradual accumulation and analysis of knowledge, but als

> In 1962, physicist and historian Thomas Kuhn proposed that science makes progress not just through the gradual accumulation and analysis of knowledge, but also through periodic revolutions in perspective. Kuhn is almost always referred to as a philosopher because he left physics to be a "philosopher of science". In a nutshell I see an article about a scientist who worships a philosopher, believes she's the leader of the third major revolution in understanding human illness, and has a theory that's plausible yet difficult to test. Doesn't make the idea wrong, but these are not good signs. In her defense she's published a few times on the subject* still something about the article's rubbing me the wrong way. * - http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=claudia+miller http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=claudia+miller