Cheers. If I could make a suggestion, I think this kind of history belongs with the bill text on a blog post; providing the 1997 version without commentary cau

Cheers. If I could make a suggestion, I think this kind of history belongs with the bill text on a blog post; providing the 1997 version without commentary caused a bit of confusion. It felt a wee bit misleading/alarmist because that text - again as far as I can tell, given the text of the later version that was approved - never actually made it into the final version. As presented it makes it seem like that's the law as it stands today.