4 ms·
The document seemed to be a report (suggestion) to alter the SAFE Act to include those provisions. The GPO link I shared doesn't list those recommendations so
by tbrake 12y ago
The document seemed to be a report (suggestion) to alter the SAFE Act to include those provisions.
The GPO link I shared doesn't list those recommendations so it looked like they didn't make it in to the final draft. So I'm not sure what the purpose of the original linked document is either.I've edited my original comment to make it clear since it was ambiguous as to what I may have been "reading wrong".
- new299 12y agoAh I see. Thanks! I guess one take away from this document is that there have been attempts to limit the availability of encryption for at least 20 years. But I think that's relatively well known.