3 ms·
You are correct to have doubt. While it is criminally illegal to falsely claim copyright, there is almost no chance of prosecution. And the only entity able to
by nkurz 12y ago
You are correct to have doubt. While it is criminally illegal to falsely claim copyright, there is almost no chance of prosecution. And the only entity able to sue under civil law would be the heirs of the photographer, who are unlikely to know that they hold the copyright. The public, while potentially deprived of the the ability to make use of the work, is not deemed to "have standing".
The seminal paper on the topic calls this "copyfraud":
Copyfraud
Jason Mazzone, University of Illinois College of Law
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 40
New York University Law Review, Vol. 81, p. 1026, 2006
Abstract:
Copyfraud is everywhere. False copyright notices appear on
modern reprints of Shakespeare's plays, Beethoven's piano
scores, greeting card versions of Monet's Water Lilies, and
even the U.S. Constitution. Archives claim blanket
copyright in everything in their collections. Vendors of
microfilmed versions of historical newspapers assert
copyright ownership. These false copyright claims, which
are often accompanied by threatened litigation for
reproducing a work without the owner's permission, result
in users seeking licenses and paying fees to reproduce
works that are free for everyone to use.
Copyright law itself creates strong incentives for
copyfraud. The Copyright Act provides for no civil penalty
for falsely claiming ownership of public domain materials.
There is also no remedy under the Act for individuals who
wrongly refrain from legal copying or who make payment for
permission to copy something they are in fact entitled to
use for free. While falsely claiming copyright is
technically a criminal offense under the Act, prosecutions
are extremely rare. These circumstances have produced fraud
on an untold scale, with millions of works in the public
domain deemed copyrighted, and countless dollars paid out
every year in licensing fees to make copies that could be
made for free. Copyfraud stifles valid forms of
reproduction and undermines free speech.
Congress should amend the Copyright Act to allow private
parties to bring civil causes of action for false copyright
claims. Courts should extend the availability of the
copyright misuse defense to prevent copyright owners from
enforcing an otherwise valid copyright if they have engaged
in past copyfraud. In addition, Congress should further
protect the public domain by creating a national registry
listing public domain works and a symbol to designate those
works. Failing a congressional response, there may exist
remedies under state law and through the efforts of private
parties to achieve these ends.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=787244 http://ssrn.com/abstract=787244
- nsajko 12y agoWhitelisting public domain works doesn't seem like such a good idea...