4 ms·
AFAIK it does. It's how museums make money with reproductions. I might be wrong on this though.
by ncza 12y ago
AFAIK it does. It's how museums make money with reproductions. I might be wrong on this though.
- teddyh 12y agoYes, museums like to claims this to make money. This does not make them right.
- schrijver 12y agoMuseums in most cases do not own the copyright to the works in their collections, yet they often pretend they do to be able to charge higher processing fees. http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/2011/06/27/copyright-museums-and-licensing-of-art-images/ http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/2011/06/27/copyright... Of course they can ask money for the cost of for example photographing, scanning etc., it is just not correct to say it is for copyright licensing.
- ncza 12y agoI thought it was obvious that I did not mean copyright of the exhibits but of reproductions like scans. Thanks for your clarifications.
- anigbrowl 12y agoScans don't meet the threshold requirement of originality under US copyright law. See for example Batlin v. Snyder - https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=originality+museum+reproduction+copyright&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&case=16845746302991569414&scilh=0 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=originality+museum...