4 ms·
I'm not sure what this article is about. At a minimum it is misguided. I don't think anyone is seriously arguing for abolishing time zones. Also, while zoneinfo
by ak217 12y ago
I'm not sure what this article is about. At a minimum it is misguided. I don't think anyone is seriously arguing for abolishing time zones. Also, while zoneinfo is great, it doesn't help with the more serious issues that arise from arcane/archaic timekeeping.
There are several major, common issues with timekeeping that cause huge engineering headaches:
- Frequent or arbitrary changes to time zone standards
- Daylight savings time
- Time zones with fractional hour offsets
- Frequent or arbitrary adjustments to UTC (universal time) in an effort to keep it more astronomically correct
The good things I can imagine happening to timekeeping are:
- Abolish daylight savings time
- Separate universal terrestrial time from "astronomically correct" time, with infrequent synchronizations fixed in time (e.g. once every decade or century)
- Abolish fractional hour offset time zones and encourage countries to consolidate time zones
- wycats 12y agoHere is an article by a smart person on Vox arguing precisely for the abolishment of Time Zones: http://www.vox.com/2014/8/5/5970767/case-against-time-zones http://www.vox.com/2014/8/5/5970767/case-against-time-zones
- henrikschroder 12y agoEDIT: I see, you were providing an example of a smart person, not an example of a smart argument. I'll let my rant stand anyway. :-) No, it's an idiotic argument, because it essentially boils down to forcing the billions of people who do not live in the GMT timezone to adjust their mental model of "what time is office hours", and you STILL haven't solved the original problem of answering the question "Hey, you are in a different timezone, is this a good time to schedule a meeting?" You STILL need to do a lookup!