4 ms·
Not non-intuitive at all. Reminds me of Rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock but in dice form.
by superobserver 12y ago
Not non-intuitive at all. Reminds me of Rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock but in dice form.
- dj-wonk 12y agoYes, the pairwise comparisons form a similar pattern as shown in the top-right pentagram in http://latkin.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/cycles12.png http://latkin.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/cycles12.p... (each die beats two others and loses to two others, in pairwise comparisons)
- latkin 12y agoThe fact that rolling doubles causes some relationships to reverse (but some to stay the same) is very interesting and non-obvious, at least to me.
- dj-wonk 12y agoGood point. As an example: olive tends to win "blue vs olive" rolls. However, blue+blue tends to win "blue+blue vs olive+olive" rolls. I uploaded blue vs olive histograms at http://imgur.com/a/p4zK8 http://imgur.com/a/p4zK8 -- note, for the comparison ones (labeled with "vs"), -1 means that the leftmost (first) roll won, 0 means a tie, and +1 means that the rightmost (last) roll won. P.S. Blue vs Magenta here: http://imgur.com/a/9e6ne http://imgur.com/a/9e6ne