> true. this is like indicting twitter because someone posted criminal sites downtime notes. Defense attorneys specialize in shedding just enough doubt over th

> true. this is like indicting twitter because someone posted criminal sites downtime notes. Defense attorneys specialize in shedding just enough doubt over the defendant's involvement that the jury won't reach a conviction. It doesn't always work (hence why trials sometimes seem so unpredictable to those of us watching from the outside), but when the burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt," any substantial doubt may be enough to convince the jury to acquit. This trial could go either way. So it's fascinating to watch.