3 ms·
No, the problem is that p(reject|null hypothesis) != p(reject|null hypothesis, experimenter saw pattern). Its true that continuous observation eventually fixes
by yummyfajitas 12y ago
No, the problem is that p(reject|null hypothesis) != p(reject|null hypothesis, experimenter saw pattern).
Its true that continuous observation eventually fixes things. In the limit of large N, we can skip the stats and just do division.