4 ms·
> I will assume the last part is just a generic statement and is not directed towards me. It's most definitely directed at you. > You are a Java dev I presume
by avasdvasdv 12y ago
> I will assume the last part is just a generic statement and is not directed towards me.
It's most definitely directed at you.
> You are a Java dev I presume?
C#/C++. Though I've worked with java before amongst others.
> As for app-level locking, I am talking about sacrificing performance, not safety.
You are sacrificing both. Only idiots truly depend on app-level locking.
> We just make sure that some piece of code runs exactly once.
Amateur hour...
> Since the need for this is very rare and the places are not performance critical, we can live with that. So no, we have no need for additional transactional guarantees on DB level.
So it's a useless pointless trivial application...
- annnnd 12y agoIncredible, I am being judged by someone on Internet... How will I survive this? </sarcasm> Another day, another idiot, I guess. (and yes, the term is definitely directed at you - if you still follow this throwaway account anyway)