3 ms·
Allowing customers to look like they are surveilling other people was a radically Orwellian-seeming move. It amazes me that Google was OK with this from the beg
by Mangalor 12y ago
Allowing customers to look like they are surveilling other people was a radically Orwellian-seeming move. It amazes me that Google was OK with this from the beginning.
- eyeareque 12y agoYou do know how google figures out what ads to show people? They collect everything they can about you :)
- fixermark 12y agoIt amazes me that people still worry about this when humans already walk around with two cameras connected to better resolution and light-level management hardware than the glass camera embedded in their skulls, and the input of those cameras, converted to audio, is generally admissible in all courts of law.
- slavik81 12y agoIt may be sharable through speech, but a picture is worth a thousand words. Even the most detailed prose leaves much to the imagination. I don't think I'd even care if someone told a story about accidentally seeing me naked, but I'd be pretty pissed off if they were sharing a video.
- avar 12y agoWhat if they had photographic memory and a lot of drawing skills and were able to produce a drawing of you naked that was indistinguishable from a photo? Should we ostracize those people from society?
- Htsthbjig 12y agoIt is not true that we have two cameras in our eyes. We do have visual sense. Completely different. The output of the system is a perception, an interpretation of reality. Most of what you are seeing right now is going to be forgotten just in seconds. You only leave what holds your attention. Cameras store the raw content of what they point to. That is gigabytes of information. The speech information is barely kilobytes of information.