3 ms·
I don't think the common claim is that it would be "evil" or malicious, but that it could be a threat, being both powerful and unpredictable. The idea that I'v
by drdeca 12y ago
I don't think the common claim is that it would be "evil" or malicious, but that it could be a threat, being both powerful and unpredictable.
The idea that I've often seen people mention, is the idea of a "paperclip optimizer", in which an AI superintelligence primarily optimizes for there being more paperclips, not taking into account side effects of this, which other people might find harmful. If I understand the idea correctly, which I very well might not, it is meant to suggest that if an AI superintelligence is created with a particular goal in mind, we would do well to be very careful when choosing the AI's goals.
It would I suppose be essentially a similar problem to that of a "literal genie". (Except harsher, because the AI would go through steps to accomplish the task, instead of just magically making the task so, and therefore would have more side effects?)