Miyagawa makes two claims. 1. L::M::L::G enables PO-based work-flow. This is not correct except for trivial lexicons. L::M::L::G cannot parse the plural extrac

Miyagawa makes two claims. 1. L::M::L::G enables PO-based work-flow. This is not correct except for trivial lexicons. L::M::L::G cannot parse the plural extract from the article, so it is incompatible with properly working PO emitters. 2. Maketext is used on typepad and "works really well". This claim is not backed by any evidence. The verifiable facts from the article pointing out the pluralisation problems of L::M still stand unchallenged.