3 ms·
It is funny to have such a good article with so many comments at the end that disagree. The issue does not seem to be so clear cut.
by reacweb 12y ago
It is funny to have such a good article with so many comments at the end that disagree. The issue does not seem to be so clear cut.
- bmn_ 12y agoMiyagawa makes two claims. 1. L::M::L::G enables PO-based work-flow. This is not correct except for trivial lexicons. L::M::L::G cannot parse the plural extract from the article, so it is incompatible with properly working PO emitters. 2. Maketext is used on typepad and "works really well". This claim is not backed by any evidence. The verifiable facts from the article pointing out the pluralisation problems of L::M still stand unchallenged.