3 ms·
Mostly, yes. There are unusual cases like medicine and some engineering, but for the most part it is just a resume checkbox. Evidence in favor of this: the she
by yummyfajitas 12y ago
Mostly, yes. There are unusual cases like medicine and some engineering, but for the most part it is just a resume checkbox.
Evidence in favor of this: the sheepskin effect is huge.
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/06/baaaa_tremble_b.html http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/06/baaaa_tremble_b.... http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/02/sheepskin_effec.html http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/02/sheepskin_effec....
So is ability bias: http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2012/01/correcting_for.html http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2012/01/correcting_for.h...
And as a thought experiment, ask yourself which of the following would have had more of an effect on your life. Suppose you failed your humanities classes (assuming you are an engineer/CS and work as such). Would your life have been significantly different than if you forgot what you learned? How about if you cheated and passed? Mine certainly would be.
In principle, wearing a suit also has a small positive effect. It arouses some women. But in general it's mostly wasteful signalling.
- swatow 12y agoThe sheepskin effect doesn't directly measure the effect of having a degree vs having exactly the same experience/education but no degree. This is because the person who gets the degree after 4 years might on average have worked a lot harder, and learned a lot more than the person who studies for 4 years but doesn't get the degree.