4 ms·

The Milky Way galaxy is approximately 100,000 light-years long and 1,000 light-years deep (Wikipedia). edit: I'm not sure why I felt the need to write that. Vo

The Milky Way galaxy is approximately 100,000 light-years long and 1,000 light-years deep (Wikipedia). edit: I'm not sure why I felt the need to write that. Voyager was 70,000 light-years from home and it was said on the show they needed 70 years at warp 9 to get home so the velocity of warp 9 must be 1,000 light-years per year (365 earth days) plus the whole faster than light thing which disregards the usual light year in a year thing. That's 2.74 light years per day which seems low considering Warp 1 is supposedly equivalent to the speed of light. We've been lied to all these years it's all fake man!

vubuntu 12y ago
What part of "2.74 light years per day" seems low? Assuming your break down to the day level is right, to expand, it means at warp 9 voyager is capable of covering a distance of 2.74 light years in 1 day. That means the distance that light could travel in 2.74 years, Voyager could cover in 1 day. So warp 9 = 2.74 x 365 x speed of light =~ 1000 times speed of light. So warp 1 = speed of light. warp 9 = 1000 times speed of light. which does not seem 'low' to me.
- boyaka 12y ago
  All you did was reverse the calculation that was done in the comment you are replying to. He already stated that warp 9 is 1000 times the speed of light: "the velocity of warp 9 must be 1,000 light-years per year"
  - vubuntu 12y ago
    OP points out that warp 1 is supposedly speed of light and yet some how warp 9 being 1000 light years per year is somehow not impressive enough. I reversed the calculation to point out that warp 9 = 1000 times speed of light. And want to know what part of it is not impressive enough or misleading. And by the way OP did not directly point out that warp 9 is 1000 times speed of light and my intention was to point that out to make sure they did not get confused by their own calculation which might have led to their underwhelming impression. Seeing OP's response to one of the comments below (warp 9 factor = 834 ) validates my assumption that OP was lost in his own calculations for a moment. Only they can confirm.
a_c_s 12y ago
Warp 9 is 834 times the speed of light Source: http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Warp_factor http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Warp_factor
- dghughes 12y ago
  I looked there but couldn't find it which I thought was odd. Thanks!

vubuntu 12y ago

What part of "2.74 light years per day" seems low? Assuming your break down to the day level is right, to expand, it means at warp 9 voyager is capable of covering a distance of 2.74 light years in 1 day. That means the distance that light could travel in 2.74 years, Voyager could cover in 1 day. So warp 9 = 2.74 x 365 x speed of light =~ 1000 times speed of light. So warp 1 = speed of light. warp 9 = 1000 times speed of light. which does not seem 'low' to me.

boyaka 12y ago
All you did was reverse the calculation that was done in the comment you are replying to. He already stated that warp 9 is 1000 times the speed of light: "the velocity of warp 9 must be 1,000 light-years per year"
- vubuntu 12y ago
  OP points out that warp 1 is supposedly speed of light and yet some how warp 9 being 1000 light years per year is somehow not impressive enough. I reversed the calculation to point out that warp 9 = 1000 times speed of light. And want to know what part of it is not impressive enough or misleading. And by the way OP did not directly point out that warp 9 is 1000 times speed of light and my intention was to point that out to make sure they did not get confused by their own calculation which might have led to their underwhelming impression. Seeing OP's response to one of the comments below (warp 9 factor = 834 ) validates my assumption that OP was lost in his own calculations for a moment. Only they can confirm.

a_c_s 12y ago

Warp 9 is 834 times the speed of light Source: http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Warp_factor http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Warp_factor

dghughes 12y ago
I looked there but couldn't find it which I thought was odd. Thanks!