2 ms·

Interesting. Perhaps this BASIC reached as far as the C=64, 128 and Plus-4 too? BTW AmigaBASIC must have been a very interesting affair too. I think Commodore'

Interesting. Perhaps this BASIC reached as far as the C=64, 128 and Plus-4 too? BTW AmigaBASIC must have been a very interesting affair too. I think Commodore's agreement with Microsoft was somehow broken after release; it was never updated, it was never really integrated into the system - Intuition, the co-processors, the famous HAM mode, etc. So it left everyone unsatisfied. And it was slow and bloated. There was a compiler for it, the AC-Basic, which I successfully used for a short while, until AmigaBASIC was literally eclipsed by AMOS.

MagerValp 12y ago
Yes, BASIC 3.5 (264 machines) and BASIC 7.0 (C128) were further developments, as well as the unreleased 3.6 (LCD) and 10.0 (C65): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_BASIC#Released_versions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_BASIC#Released_versio... AmigaBASIC was indeed a bit of a lame duck. I used HiSoft BASIC myself, which was backwards compatible but added a lot of features, including a compiler.