> But it also included a substance that the report indicated could be of “even greater user” to our civilization, a substance which could revolutionize energy p

> But it also included a substance that the report indicated could be of “even greater user” to our civilization, a substance which could revolutionize energy production. They put this typo in quotes just to shame the (likely non-native English speaking) author? This kind of shit in pop-sci articles is getting pretty tired.