I've read the book and would not call it exploratory at all--it is lengthy and exhaustive. I found myself skimming over additional supporting data in many cases

I've read the book and would not call it exploratory at all--it is lengthy and exhaustive. I found myself skimming over additional supporting data in many cases. I'm most interested in accusations that he cherry-picked his sources or data, and I haven't seen any of these backed up. (Other than rambling rants like the above "criticism" which says that adjusting for world population is "massaging the numbers".) Edit: typos