3 ms·
great thanks, 100 times cheaper than the forbes article. ps it wasn't obvious at all, that's why i wrote "even more wacky" as mark of how solid i thought the f
by throwawayaway 12y ago
great thanks, 100 times cheaper than the forbes article.
ps it wasn't obvious at all, that's why i wrote "even more wacky" as mark of how solid i thought the figures were.
3600*7 = 25200 transactions for $6521.
they'd really want to see about increasing the block size.
- brazzy 12y agoThe block size is not the limit here; the protocol aims for one block every 10 minutes so that users don't have to wait too long to get a transaction confirmed. Cost per transaction would go down drastically with increased usage.