But I am inclined to believe Ulbricht here. You don't even need to believe him, as long as it casts doubt on the prosecution's narrative. I'm interested to see

But I am inclined to believe Ulbricht here. You don't even need to believe him, as long as it casts doubt on the prosecution's narrative. I'm interested to see what digital forensics the government relies on to prove association with the evidence. Is he guilty? Probably. But that is not sufficient for conviction, at least in theory.