3 ms·
Well, that's kinda the point. If there was a better way to have to achieve GC-free semantics, Rust would have taken it. As for optional GC, didn't D haven't so
by Ygg2 12y ago
Well, that's kinda the point. If there was a better way to have to achieve GC-free semantics, Rust would have taken it.
As for optional GC, didn't D haven't something along those lines?
- masklinn 12y agoLike Nim you can disable the GC in D. AFAIK, most libraries won't handle that situation gracefully as they don't expect it.