3 ms·
I think HTTP/2 should have opportunistic encryption support, as per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015JanMar/0106.html https://lists.w3.org/
by cnst 12y ago
I think HTTP/2 should have opportunistic encryption support, as per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015JanMar/0106.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015JanMar....
As things stand, HTTP/2 is not done in compliance with RFC 7258 / BCP 188, because it doesn't do anything for the independent sites that cannot deploy the `https://` https://` address scheme for compatibility reasons.
You basically either have to support the whole pre-1.2 TLS and forget about http:// http://, or you cannot have any TLS at all.
- youngtaff 12y agoYou need to read the rest of that thread there are several wrong assertions in that email not least that HTTP/2 requires TLS - the reality is Chrome and Firefox have decided to only support it over TLS