Judging from the rest of the article, which argues for more time off because it'll make workers more productive, it seems to be aimed precisely at capitalists.

Judging from the rest of the article, which argues for more time off because it'll make workers more productive, it seems to be aimed precisely at capitalists. In that context some ego-stroking historical revisionism shouldn't be surprising. If it's in service of bringing about better worker rights in the US it's... I dunno, justified, I guess? Ends, means, and all that. Still gross.