4 ms·
> We're going around in circles I think. Just you, my friend. If you recall, here is the point you were challenging: > this is a band-aid over the fact that
by RickHull 12y ago
> We're going around in circles I think.
Just you, my friend. If you recall, here is the point you were challenging:
> this is a band-aid over the fact that OSes have terrible permission separation and application isolation. If OSes were better architected from a security point of view, it would be substantially less of a problem.
Would you now concede this point?
- ksk 12y ago> If you recall, here is the point you were challenging: Yes, and I didn't receive any information that would lead me to believe that applying his/her suggestions would substantially tackle the root problem. All process isolation does is push the problem out further into the application side of things. Now the user has to micromanage the data flow in between applications. The root problem has very little to do with OS architecture, and I'm happy to be convinced otherwise. >Would you now concede this point? Okay. If you insist. I have no desire to "win" the argument. It's merely idle chit chat for me. My code's compiling ;)