2 ms·
But those aren't contradictory statements at all? Title II let Verizon charge more for phone service which was used to fund broadband. Verizon also says that Ti
by forrestthewoods 12y ago
But those aren't contradictory statements at all? Title II let Verizon charge more for phone service which was used to fund broadband. Verizon also says that Title II for broadband would harm additional investment for broadband. Both statements can easily be true. (emphasis can) There's nothing "red-handed" about this.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- jconley 12y agoThe alleged red-handed part is that Verizon used Title II to build out fiber lines under the guise it was improving its telephone service, but was actually using the fiber for broadband services which it does not want regulated under Title II. Sounds like the proverbial "having your cake and eating it too".